+ Used Car Home     + Used Cars for Sale     + Car Reviews     + Auto Repair

 2005 Ford Freestyle Review
Whether you're about to spend $40K on a brand new car, or half that on a used car, it is always important to learn as much as you can about the used car. Read these car reviews to learn about all aspects of the vehicle. Each of the usedcar reviews cover interior and exterior features, options, road tests, and more.

Introduction | Road Test | Inside & Out | Other Thoughts | Last Word

 Road Test

When equipped with the same drivetrain, the Freestyle should drive like a Five Hundred with 295 extra pounds of fat in its hind end. The Freestyle runs on all the same parts as its sedan equivalent, which means it shares the same nice steering, same boring-but-pleasant handling, same firm brakes, and same composed ride. Aside from the same road noise, you'll hear the same absence of the same other sounds. None of this is much of a coincidence, since they're both based on the same set of Volvos.

The one distinct difference over our tested Five Hundred is this Freestyle's Continuously Variable Transmission, which comes standard on specific Five Hundreds and all Freestyles. Once a niche technology limited to small-engined economy cars, the CVT has made its way into more serious machines like the Audi A4, Nissan Murano, and now these Fords. Unlike standard automatic transmissions that usually have four or five fixed gear ratios, CVTs are free to select any ratio they please. Freedom means choice. Choice is good. Also, the Freestyle's ratios span the range from 2.47 (think of it as "low gear") to 0.41 ("high gear"), forming a wide spread of more than 6 to 1. Wide means flexible. Flexible is good.

Everyone on Earth knows the acceleration process as a series of engine revs rising and falling - the falling being caused by the transmission's upshifts. But in the Freestyle, the engine instantly spins to a high speed and just stays there for a while, then gradually settles down as the CVT adjusts its ratios. It's an unfamiliar sensation that might feel wrong in the heads of those who associate shifting with progress. It's a little like visiting Hawaii and realizing it's possible for rain and hot weather to mix.

But nevermind what your mind tells you because technically, a CVT is better. The absence of big steps lets you forget about bad habits like the computer jolting all passengers on a downshift after choosing the wrong gear - an acute problem in many Ford automatics, by the way. With a CVT, stab the pedal all you want and expect seamless acceleration all the time. Once up to speed, its mapping isn't too different from a normal automatic's: almost floor it and revs rise a bunch; floor it completely and the tach zings to redline. The verdict: the CVT works! The only disappointment was our 20 MPG average - two less than our Five Hundred. Maybe this shouldn't be a surprise, considering how biased this CVT is in favor of high revs.

The other difference between our tested Five Hundred and Freestyle was this Freestyle's P215/65R17 tires. In hard driving these slightly smaller, narrower, higher-profile tires squeal noticeably earlier than the 18-inchers on the Limited trim line of both cars (maybe in part because the 18-inchers are better Pirellis?), but they still have enough grip for a responsibly-driven family hauler.

Speaking of enough, I described this Ford Taurus-sourced engine as "adequate" in the Five Hundred. That may be too generous a ruling for the Freestyle, in part because of the extra poundage, in part because most people reportedly order them with all-wheel-drive (more poundage), and because choosing a wagon reflects different needs than choosing a sedan. Our Freestyle's power served me fine, but a father driving an AWD Freestyle with his wife, five half-pints, a stuffed cargo load, and the air conditioner running would find himself short on engine and patience. Until somebody drops the Crown Vic's V8 in here, anyone looking to get any real work done will be flocking to the Dodge Magnum.

 Other Ford Reviews
2008 Ford Taurus X Review
2008 Ford Taurus Review
2008 Ford Escape Review
2008 Ford Explorer Review
2008 Ford Fusion Review
2008 Ford F-250 Review
2008 Ford Expedition Review
2008 Ford Mustang Review
2008 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Review
2008 Ford F-150 Review
2007 Ford Focus Review
2007 Ford Fusion Review
2007 Ford Expedition Review
2007 Ford Mustang Review
2007 Ford Explorer Review
2007 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Review
2007 Ford F-150 Review
2007 Ford Edge Review
2006 Ford Escape Review
2006 Ford Explorer Review
2006 Ford Freestar Review
2006 Ford Focus Review
2006 Ford Fusion Review
2006 Ford Expedition Review
2006 Ford Mustang Review
2006 Ford F-150 Review
2006 Ford Five Hundred Review
2006 Ford Freestyle Review
2005 Ford F-150 Review
2005 Ford Thunderbird Review
2005 Ford Five Hundred Review
2005 Ford F-250 Review
2005 Ford Ranger Review
2005 Ford GT Review
2005 Ford Freestyle Review
2005 Ford Escape Review
2005 Ford Explorer Review
2005 Ford Freestar Review
2005 Ford Focus Review
2005 Ford Expedition Review
2005 Ford Mustang Review
2004 Ford F-250 Review
2004 Ford Excursion Review
2004 Ford Ranger Review
2004 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Review
2004 Ford Escape Review
2004 Ford Explorer Review
2004 Ford Freestar Review
2004 Ford Focus Review
2004 Ford Crown Victoria Review
2004 Ford Expedition Review
2004 Ford Mustang Review
2004 Ford Taurus Review
2004 Ford F-150 Review
2004 Ford Thunderbird Review
2003 Ford Ranger Review
2003 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Review
2003 Ford Escape Review
2003 Ford Explorer Review
2003 Ford ZX2 Review
2003 Ford Focus Review
2003 Ford Crown Victoria Review
2003 Ford Expedition Review
2003 Ford Mustang Review
2003 Ford Taurus Review
2003 Ford F-150 Review
2003 Ford Thunderbird Review
2003 Ford F-250 Review
2003 Ford Windstar Review
2002 Ford Excursion Review
2002 Ford Escape Review
2002 Ford Explorer Review
2002 Ford ZX2 Review
2002 Ford Focus Review
2002 Ford Mustang Review
2002 Ford Taurus Review
2002 Ford F-150 Review
2002 Ford Thunderbird Review
2002 Ford F-250 Review
2002 Ford Windstar Review
2002 Ford Ranger Review
2002 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Review
2001 Ford Focus Review
2001 Ford Mustang Review
2001 Ford Taurus Review
2001 Ford Expedition Review
2001 Ford F-150 Review
2001 Ford F-250 Review
2001 Ford Windstar Review
2001 Ford Ranger Review
2001 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Review
2001 Ford Excursion Review
2001 Ford Escape Review
2000 Ford Taurus Review
2000 Ford Expedition Review
2000 Ford F-150 Review
2000 Ford Windstar Review
2000 Ford Escort Review
2000 Ford Ranger Review
2000 Ford Excursion Review
2000 Ford Focus Review
2000 Ford Contour Review
2000 Ford Mustang Review
2000 Ford Explorer Review
1999 Ford Windstar Review
1999 Ford Escort Review
1999 Ford Ranger Review
1999 Ford F-250 Review
1999 Ford Mustang Review
1999 Ford Explorer Review
1999 Ford Taurus Review
1999 Ford Expedition Review
1999 Ford F-150 Review
1998 Ford Mustang Review
1998 Ford Explorer Review
1998 Ford Taurus Review
1998 Ford Contour Review
1998 Ford Expedition Review
1998 Ford F-150 Review
1998 Ford Windstar Review
1998 Ford Escort Review
1998 Ford Ranger Review
1997 Ford F-250 Review
1997 Ford Mustang Review
1997 Ford Crown Victoria Review
1997 Ford Explorer Review
1997 Ford Taurus Review
1997 Ford Expedition Review
1997 Ford F-150 Review
1997 Ford Escort Review
1997 Ford Ranger Review
1996 Ford Mustang Review
1996 Ford Taurus Review
1996 Ford Ranger Review
1996 Ford Windstar Review
1996 Ford Aerostar Review
1995 Ford Crown Victoria Review
1995 Ford Explorer Review
1995 Ford F-150 Review
1995 Ford Ranger Review
1995 Ford Contour Review
1995 Ford Windstar Review
1995 Ford Escort Review
1995 Ford Aerostar Review
1995 Ford Mustang Review
1995 Ford Probe Review
1995 Ford Taurus Review
1995 Ford Aspire Review
1994 Ford F-150 Review
1994 Ford Ranger Review
1994 Ford Bronco Review
1994 Ford Aerostar Review
1994 Ford Thunderbird Review
1994 Ford Taurus Review
1994 Ford Explorer Review

Used Car Home       Used Cars for Sale       Car Reviews       Auto Repair
UsedCar.us.com - Copywrite - All Rights Reserved