+ Used Car Home     + Used Cars for Sale     + Car Reviews     + Auto Repair

 2005 Ford Focus Review
Whether you're about to spend $40K on a brand new car, or half that on a used car, it is always important to learn as much as you can about the used car. Read these car reviews to learn about all aspects of the vehicle. Each of the usedcar reviews cover interior and exterior features, options, road tests, and more.

Introduction | Road Test | Inside & Out | Other Thoughts | Last Word

 Road Test

Could've fooled me. Despite some of the oldest bones in the business and America's different suspension tuning, the Focus's character is undiminished. Ten seconds at the wheel are all it takes to sense that the guys who designed the Taurus and the guys who designed the Focus speak two different languages. That the Focus speaks at all is the first clue. Most small cars turn corners with the spirit of a kid chewing spinach, but fling the Focus around and you get nothing but playfulness and encouragement. The feel of the steering is, in a word, great. In two words, really great, and in three, best in class. Effort builds naturally, feedback is abundant, and there's a pure, prominent self-centering action that increases strongly with speed. I was hooked by my first U-turn.

That's steering; now on to springing. Suspensions are a compromise no matter how one chooses to tune them. Europe likes them stiff, but since all too many American streets look like the result of clumsily-dropped A-bombs, the front struts and rear mutlilinks ("control blades" in Ford-speak) on our Focus are sprung softer. Despite our SES model's "Enhanced European Suspension," there ain't a tower in all of Italy that leans more than the Focus.

And even with the SES's P205/50R16 Pirelli P6 FourSeason tires, grip is not exactly outstanding either. They squeal pretty early considering their low profiles and AA traction rating, especially on so light a car. They do send clear signals, however, which keeps the communication theme going. Furthermore, the Focus can be coaxed into a rear-end slide: just stab the brakes in any moderately-fast turn and the hatch goes flying. It's almost as if Ford re-employed Mazda's rear suspension toe-out feature from those 91-96 Escorts. Danger? This is front-wheel-drive - what danger? Ok, it's a little scary how the traction control seems to wait a few ticks to catch the slide; the day could come when it's one tick too late. But it's still fun.

Since not everyone treats his commute as a time trial, the suspension allows for some suppleness in the semi-firm ride. The Focus feels as rock-solid on the freeway as any Euro-bred car. The rear brakes are of a drum design on most models, but respond so normally and naturally that I had to look this up. Even Ford's electronics seem to have undertaken a foreign work ethic: on the slightest uphill grade, the cruise control is absolutely determined to hold your speed, downshifting to second gear and revving the engine's guts out. Such dedication! Remember when older Ford cruise controls simply gave up? If only it could ease up on the throttle once the angles drop; it lingers too long in the lower gear. Also, it steps up in too-large 2-3 MPH increments (picky, I know).

2005 sees more global influence, as all Ford cars powered by 4-cylinder engines (all two of them) have traded in their Ford blocks for Mazda motors. Most Foci get the 2.0-liter found in the base-level Mazda 3 (the one without balance shafts or valve timing, unfortunately), which somehow returns with only 136 horsepower instead of 148. Likewise, the EPA highway mileage rating got knocked from 34 to 32. Who knew numbers could get lost in translation?

Living in a state whose abbreviation is CA, MA, ME, NY, or VT earns another downward bump to 130 horsepower in the name of partial-zero emissions. Hey, I'm all for clean air, but in a car that's no powerhouse to begin with, these deductions keep acceleration at barely passable levels. The engine is also a bit loud and agricultural-sounding when going slow, though at higher speeds it seems to play at the right volume since the road noise drowns it out, and all you hear is sportiness. The automatic transmission is also smooth in shifting and free of random lockouts on the shiftgate, unlike American Fords. Those who want real sport in their Focus can order the ST sedan, which gets the Mazda 3's other motor: a stronger, smoother 2.3-liter. It certainly suits the Focus' character, but Ford's choice to pair it exclusively to a manual transmission is baffling and severely limits its audience. And why can't these guys paint a redline on any of their tachometers?

Still, I could live with the Focus's performance as it is. And I could certainly live with its 28 miles per gallon.

 Other Ford Reviews
2008 Ford Escape Review
2008 Ford Explorer Review
2008 Ford Fusion Review
2008 Ford F-250 Review
2008 Ford Expedition Review
2008 Ford Mustang Review
2008 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Review
2008 Ford F-150 Review
2008 Ford Taurus X Review
2008 Ford Taurus Review
2007 Ford Focus Review
2007 Ford Fusion Review
2007 Ford Expedition Review
2007 Ford Mustang Review
2007 Ford Explorer Review
2007 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Review
2007 Ford F-150 Review
2007 Ford Edge Review
2006 Ford F-150 Review
2006 Ford Five Hundred Review
2006 Ford Freestyle Review
2006 Ford Escape Review
2006 Ford Explorer Review
2006 Ford Freestar Review
2006 Ford Focus Review
2006 Ford Fusion Review
2006 Ford Expedition Review
2006 Ford Mustang Review
2005 Ford Five Hundred Review
2005 Ford F-250 Review
2005 Ford Ranger Review
2005 Ford GT Review
2005 Ford Freestyle Review
2005 Ford Escape Review
2005 Ford Explorer Review
2005 Ford Freestar Review
2005 Ford Focus Review
2005 Ford Expedition Review
2005 Ford Mustang Review
2005 Ford F-150 Review
2005 Ford Thunderbird Review
2004 Ford Ranger Review
2004 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Review
2004 Ford Escape Review
2004 Ford Explorer Review
2004 Ford Freestar Review
2004 Ford Focus Review
2004 Ford Crown Victoria Review
2004 Ford Expedition Review
2004 Ford Mustang Review
2004 Ford Taurus Review
2004 Ford F-150 Review
2004 Ford Thunderbird Review
2004 Ford F-250 Review
2004 Ford Excursion Review
2003 Ford Escape Review
2003 Ford Explorer Review
2003 Ford ZX2 Review
2003 Ford Focus Review
2003 Ford Crown Victoria Review
2003 Ford Expedition Review
2003 Ford Mustang Review
2003 Ford Taurus Review
2003 Ford F-150 Review
2003 Ford Thunderbird Review
2003 Ford F-250 Review
2003 Ford Windstar Review
2003 Ford Ranger Review
2003 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Review
2002 Ford Focus Review
2002 Ford Mustang Review
2002 Ford Taurus Review
2002 Ford F-150 Review
2002 Ford Thunderbird Review
2002 Ford F-250 Review
2002 Ford Windstar Review
2002 Ford Ranger Review
2002 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Review
2002 Ford Excursion Review
2002 Ford Escape Review
2002 Ford Explorer Review
2002 Ford ZX2 Review
2001 Ford Expedition Review
2001 Ford F-150 Review
2001 Ford F-250 Review
2001 Ford Windstar Review
2001 Ford Ranger Review
2001 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Review
2001 Ford Excursion Review
2001 Ford Escape Review
2001 Ford Focus Review
2001 Ford Mustang Review
2001 Ford Taurus Review
2000 Ford Windstar Review
2000 Ford Escort Review
2000 Ford Ranger Review
2000 Ford Excursion Review
2000 Ford Focus Review
2000 Ford Contour Review
2000 Ford Mustang Review
2000 Ford Explorer Review
2000 Ford Taurus Review
2000 Ford Expedition Review
2000 Ford F-150 Review
1999 Ford F-250 Review
1999 Ford Mustang Review
1999 Ford Explorer Review
1999 Ford Taurus Review
1999 Ford Expedition Review
1999 Ford F-150 Review
1999 Ford Windstar Review
1999 Ford Escort Review
1999 Ford Ranger Review
1998 Ford Mustang Review
1998 Ford Explorer Review
1998 Ford Taurus Review
1998 Ford Contour Review
1998 Ford Expedition Review
1998 Ford F-150 Review
1998 Ford Windstar Review
1998 Ford Escort Review
1998 Ford Ranger Review
1997 Ford Crown Victoria Review
1997 Ford Explorer Review
1997 Ford Taurus Review
1997 Ford Expedition Review
1997 Ford F-150 Review
1997 Ford Escort Review
1997 Ford Ranger Review
1997 Ford F-250 Review
1997 Ford Mustang Review
1996 Ford Ranger Review
1996 Ford Windstar Review
1996 Ford Aerostar Review
1996 Ford Mustang Review
1996 Ford Taurus Review
1995 Ford Ranger Review
1995 Ford Contour Review
1995 Ford Windstar Review
1995 Ford Escort Review
1995 Ford Aerostar Review
1995 Ford Mustang Review
1995 Ford Probe Review
1995 Ford Taurus Review
1995 Ford Aspire Review
1995 Ford Crown Victoria Review
1995 Ford Explorer Review
1995 Ford F-150 Review
1994 Ford Aerostar Review
1994 Ford Thunderbird Review
1994 Ford Taurus Review
1994 Ford Explorer Review
1994 Ford F-150 Review
1994 Ford Ranger Review
1994 Ford Bronco Review

Used Car Home       Used Cars for Sale       Car Reviews       Auto Repair
UsedCar.us.com - Copywrite - All Rights Reserved